Vineyard Performance Benchmarking
benchmarking picture

AHA Viticulture currently provides the Australian wine industry with a financial and technical benchmarking program called VineSite.

The website is located at www.vinesite.pvaustralia.com.au

VineSite was developed in a joint project between AHA Viticulture and GWRDC in 2005/2006.
It is currently free to participate in, so if you are a grower or a grower group, go to www.vinesite.pvaustralia.com.au to get started, or contact us.

Why is our benchmark service different?

Since 1996, we have provided monthly management variance reports to our vineyard managers and clients. This requires the preparation of detailed budgets and the collection of accurate vineyard costs. The aim of the reports is to provide the manager and owner with current management information that is of direct use in improving the performance of the vineyard. We need to have answers to questions such as:

The key to good management of operations is activity-based accounting.

We collect costs against an activity-based chart of accounts, rather than the conventional accounting chart which is designed for statutory and tax reporting for operations management. Activity- based accounting is commonly used in mining and industry to isolate the performance of key sections of the operation and hence to better manage the costs of each activity. Thus, in our chart of accounts, the activity "Pest & Disease Control" will include not only agricultural chemicals, but also the labour hours used to procure, mix and apply the chemicals, the cost of running the tractor and equipment, the supervisor's time instructing the operators, calibrating the equipment and attending to records. The AHA chart does not have cost groups called "labour", or "fuel", or "chemicals".

Each vineyard is divided into units that form profit centres.

Our vineyards are divided into blocks or management units with similar viticultural characteristics, as is common practice throughout the industry. We treat each management unit as an individual profit centre. Thus the cost of each activity is known for each unit, as is the contribution made to the profit of the enterprise by each unit.

Is it worth the effort?

Undoubtedly! Every year, analysis of the information provided by the management reports has been illuminating. Not only are there large variations in performance between enterprises, but the variation between units within each vineyard is astounding. In 2002, a grower enterprise that generated above average surpluses of $9,500 per hectare was found to include one block that generated a surplus of $15,900 per hectare and another that showed a loss of $35 per hectare. This year one grower generated an average loss of $10,009 per hectare, but had one block that generated an outstanding profit of $18,953 per hectare. While all of the wineries in the study showed reasonable average profits, there were also huge ranges in profitability between their blocks. For example, losses ranged from $6,810 per hectare to one block showing a profit of $17,545 per hectare. Vine performance and fruit quality data is also collected for each block, aiding in identifying the reasons for a block's financial performance. Knowing which portion of the vineyard contributes (or detracts) from the bottom line, and why it does, enables us to maximise the performance of the whole enterprise.

What are the principal benefits of benchmarking?


For the accountant, strategic planner, valuer, vineyard owner:

For the owner/manager:

How do we do it?

If you would like more information on this service, please contact our office and we will direct you to the appropriate person:

Phone: (08) 9756 8011
Fax: (08) 9756 8033